Digital Photography Vs Film Photography: The Great Debate Ever since the introduction of the digital camera, a war has raged within the photographer community. There are those that claim 35 mm film is the one “true professional” media and digital its casual counterpart. Conversely, as costs decrease and quality increases, there is an ever-expanding group of working photographers that shoot and produce only in digital. So what is a consumer to think? Is 35mm still the way to go, or is it time to trade up for a new digital model? Its time to break each format down and seal this deal, once and for all.
Digital Photography: Amateur? It is true that there are many digital cameras on the market, and like their 35mm counterparts, there is an endless supply of variables that can impact the images each one is capable of producing. Image quality (in terms of color contrast and depth of field) has always been a major concern for those taking digital images and is still one of the common excuses heard from the opposition. Add to this the fact that finding a digital camera that could match the sheer raw data contained in a photograph on film was both arduous and incredibly expensive, and the 35mm enthusiast has a fairly solid argument.
Fortunately for the consumer, the price of a high-quality digital camera has dropped sharply in the last few years. Canon’s popular Digital Rebel line of SLRs has given people an affordable (under $1,000) entry-level camera that produces near professional results. And since Canon isn’t the only camera company, it’s a safe bet that consumers can look forward to even better cameras at lower prices in the near future.35mm: Is it Antiquated? These days why use film at all? It’s certainly no secret that film has an unforgiving and often expensive learning curve, and recent trends show professionals leaning heavily on digital for precisely those reasons. After all, when taking pictures at an event like a Super Bowl, would it better to have the potential for thousands of pictures, or just the film you have with you? Sports Illustrated photographers answered that question by shooting over 16 thousand images in 2004’s bowl, entirely in digital.
However, just as some music enthusiasts claim that everything sounds better on a record, there are plenty of photographers who agree that there is no matching the warmth and familiarity of a fresh roll of film. In fact, developing film manually and printing photos in a darkroom is for someone of the most rewarding photographic experiences a photographer can have. Sure, photos can be endlessly edited and re-edited using fancy tools like Adobe Photoshop, but clicking a mouse is just very different than the tactile sensations of the darkroom. And of course, having someone else print up a roll of film can take as little as an hour. And the Winner is Neither!
Based on the accessibility of technology and the vast educational resources devoted to the topic, there’s really no defining point that wins this battle one way or the other. As with many debates, the winner is going to be decided based upon the needs and desires of the individual photographer. Families wanting to take pictures and share their memories on the fly often choose digital due to its instant gratification and convenience, while others like having photo prints to display them in a picture frame or album. Thanks to powerful yet affordable innovations in digital and the classic, “do it yourself familiarity of the film” the choice is now directly in the hands of the consumer- right where it belongs. Source: Free Articles from ArticlesFactory.com
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Autumn Lockwood is a writer for Your Picture Frames.com and loves photography. Your Picture Frames offers a large selection of different shapes, styles, and sizes like our popular double picture frames.